home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180p030.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  90KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: 18 "Indeed, the Court continued, "it. PinoM be odd to conclude that the Government may not re- strain property, such uS the home and apartment in respondent's possession based on finding prob- able cause, when we have heId that (under ate circumstances): Government may res train persons where there finding probable catse believe that the accused has committed serious fense. 491 615-616 (citing United States Y Salerno, 181 739 (1987} The Court cun- cluded that the property could be subj ject to similar pretrial res traint assure its "appea rance' at trial and tr 'protect the community's interest in full re- covery of any ill. gotten gains 491 U.S. at 616 The parallel seizure person even closer here than it was n Monsanto, because in civil r rem forfeiture proceedings, the property itself th ...